500,000-Seat GNU/Linux Deployment in Brazil

Sneaky Weasel stated in post 4e7ec227$ on 9/24/11 10:54
PM:

On 09/21/2011 03:22 PM, Hadron wrote:

Arizona Freak writes:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:25:00 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

Sneaky Weasel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

On 09/21/2011 12:37 PM, Arizona Freak wrote:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:12:47 -0700, Snit wrote:

So what does that say about GNU / Stallman? Do you really think
GNU/Linux
folks are more likely to support child porn and pedophilia than are
other
groups?

I don't believe that at all.
The Linux users just don't have the balls to buck the herd,
especially one of their leaders, so they try to derail the topic
regarding Stallman's somewhat strange comments.

Stallman supports free speech and you ass holes make it out to look like
he is a pervert.

Look at what Snit wrote, and be dumbfounded. I used to think Snit was
just an ADD obsessive compulsive candy-ass, but he's proven to be a
nasty piece of work.

Buttressed by "Hadron" and "Arizone Freak" (Flounder) of course.

Stallman's own remarks are linked to here.
http://trw.gallopinginsanity.com/20...x-scandals
Those are Stallman's words (the links), not snit's.

So now instead of reacting exactly the way I predicted you would
react, why not actually speak your own opinion on what Stallman has
publicly stated.
I'm not flounder btw not that it matters because you seem fixated on
attacking messenger's instead of commenting on the topic.

Creepy Chris has been given his orders by his Master Roy and thats all
that matters.

Roy is respected because of what he offers. That does not make him
anyone's master.

Roy is afraid to face those who point out his lies.

Sneaky Weasel stated in post on 9/24/11 10:53 PM:

On 09/21/2011 02:37 PM, Arizona Freak wrote:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:25:00 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

Sneaky Weasel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

On 09/21/2011 12:37 PM, Arizona Freak wrote:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:12:47 -0700, Snit wrote:

So what does that say about GNU / Stallman? Do you really think
GNU/Linux
folks are more likely to support child porn and pedophilia than are other
groups?

I don't believe that at all.
The Linux users just don't have the balls to buck the herd,
especially one of their leaders, so they try to derail the topic
regarding Stallman's somewhat strange comments.

Stallman supports free speech and you ass holes make it out to look like
he is a pervert.

Look at what Snit wrote, and be dumbfounded. I used to think Snit was
just an ADD obsessive compulsive candy-ass, but he's proven to be a
nasty piece of work.

Buttressed by "Hadron" and "Arizone Freak" (Flounder) of course.

Stallman's own remarks are linked to here.
http://trw.gallopinginsanity.com/20...x-scandals
Those are Stallman's words (the links), not snit's.

So now instead of reacting exactly the way I predicted you would
react, why not actually speak your own opinion on what Stallman has
publicly stated.
I'm not flounder btw not that it matters because you seem fixated on
attacking messenger's instead of commenting on the topic.

Stallman is for free speech so you hate him. That is all this means.
Why would you attack a man who made GNU/Linux possible.

Nobody has said they have a problem with supporting free speech.

The problem is Stallman's support of child sexual abuse.

<http://trw.gallopinginsanity.com/20...andals>

Sneaky Weasel writes:

On 09/21/2011 03:22 PM, Hadron wrote:

Arizona Freak writes:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:25:00 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

Sneaky Weasel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

On 09/21/2011 12:37 PM, Arizona Freak wrote:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:12:47 -0700, Snit wrote:

So what does that say about GNU / Stallman? Do you really think GNU/Linux
folks are more likely to support child porn and pedophilia than are other
groups?

I don't believe that at all.
The Linux users just don't have the balls to buck the herd,
especially one of their leaders, so they try to derail the topic
regarding Stallman's somewhat strange comments.

Stallman supports free speech and you ass holes make it out to look like
he is a pervert.

Look at what Snit wrote, and be dumbfounded. I used to think Snit was
just an ADD obsessive compulsive candy-ass, but he's proven to be a
nasty piece of work.

Buttressed by "Hadron" and "Arizone Freak" (Flounder) of course.

Stallman's own remarks are linked to here.
http://trw.gallopinginsanity.com/20...x-scandals
Those are Stallman's words (the links), not snit's.

So now instead of reacting exactly the way I predicted you would
react, why not actually speak your own opinion on what Stallman has
publicly stated.
I'm not flounder btw not that it matters because you seem fixated on
attacking messenger's instead of commenting on the topic.

Creepy Chris has been given his orders by his Master Roy and thats all
that matters.

Roy is respected because of what he offers. That does not make him anyone's
master.

Roy is not respected by anyone outside of COLA. In fact he is a
laughing stock. And even here many of the "advocates" have him
killfiled. Just look who replies to his spam.

And he most certainly IS Creepy Chris' Master.

Sneaky Weasel writes:

On 09/21/2011 03:22 PM, Hadron wrote:

Chris Ahlstrom writes:

Sneaky Weasel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

On 09/21/2011 12:37 PM, Arizona Freak wrote:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:12:47 -0700, Snit wrote:

So what does that say about GNU / Stallman? Do you really think GNU/Linux
folks are more likely to support child porn and pedophilia than are other
groups?

I don't believe that at all.
The Linux users just don't have the balls to buck the herd,
especially one of their leaders, so they try to derail the topic
regarding Stallman's somewhat strange comments.

Stallman supports free speech and you ass holes make it out to look like
he is a pervert.

Look at what Snit wrote, and be dumbfounded. I used to think Snit was
just an ADD obsessive compulsive candy-ass, but he's proven to be a
nasty piece of work.

Buttressed by "Hadron" and "Arizone Freak" (Flounder) of course.

Says the man who called posters "cunts" and "fuckheads"? Who openly
criticised such FOSS luminaries as Joerg Schilling and Miguel de Icaza?

You're a nasty little hypocrite Chris. And dont think we dont know it.

For anyone not in the know Creepy Chris earns his cash from closed
source Windows coding. Amazing eh?

You are called names for a reason. Why are you even here?

To advocate Gnu/Linux, particularly Debian, and to correct the lies from
the morons who inhabit this group.

If you dont believe me and can think for yourself, find a post from me
"advocating" Windows over Linux were there was no facts to back it up :
e.g I would advise the average iPhone using home owner who wants to play
some games etc to use Windows since they'll never get the same
satisfaction from a Linux based distro. Someone more techy who doesnt
want to pay games? Linux every time. I do ALL my work on Debian
Linux. Sometimes its a struggle but I would never go back to Windows.

Sneaky Weasel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

On 09/21/2011 03:22 PM, Hadron wrote:

Arizona Freak writes:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:25:00 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

Sneaky Weasel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

On 09/21/2011 12:37 PM, Arizona Freak wrote:

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:12:47 -0700, Snit wrote:

So what does that say about GNU / Stallman? Do you really think GNU/Linux
folks are more likely to support child porn and pedophilia than are other
groups?

I don't believe that at all.
The Linux users just don't have the balls to buck the herd,
especially one of their leaders, so they try to derail the topic
regarding Stallman's somewhat strange comments.

Stallman supports free speech and you ass holes make it out to look like
he is a pervert.

Look at what Snit wrote, and be dumbfounded. I used to think Snit was
just an ADD obsessive compulsive candy-ass, but he's proven to be a
nasty piece of work.

Buttressed by "Hadron" and "Arizone Freak" (Flounder) of course.

Stallman's own remarks are linked to here.
http://trw.gallopinginsanity.com/20...x-scandals
Those are Stallman's words (the links), not snit's.

So now instead of reacting exactly the way I predicted you would
react, why not actually speak your own opinion on what Stallman has
publicly stated.
I'm not flounder btw not that it matters because you seem fixated on
attacking messenger's instead of commenting on the topic.

Creepy Chris has been given his orders by his Master Roy and thats all
that matters.

Roy is respected because of what he offers. That does not make him
anyone's master.

Only to nasty kids, is Roy a "master". It is laffable.

What we wish, that we readily believe.