Bug#421828: RFP: apacheds -- Directory server (LDAP) by the Apache Foundation

May 01st, 2007 - 03:30 pm ET by Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) | Report spam
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name : apacheds
Version : 1.5.0
Upstream Author : ApacheDS Team
* URL : http://directory.apache.org/
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Directory server (LDAP) by the Apache Foundation

ApacheDS 1.0 is an embeddable, extendable, standards compliant, modern
LDAP server written entirely in Java, and available under the Apache
Software License. Other network protocols like Kerberos and NTP are
supported as well (and even more may be added), but basically (and
especially for this introduction guide) ApacheDS is an LDAP server.
..
Homepage: http://directory.apache.org/

Maybe pkg-java could check and package apacheDS ?
Maybe we should create apacheds1.0 and apacheds1.5 packages, to handle
both stable and unstable branches.

Regards, Adam.

Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
email Follow the discussionReplies 1 replyReplies Make a reply

Similar topics

Replies

#1 Arnaud Vandyck
May 02nd, 2007 - 04:30 am ET | Report spam
owner 421828
thanks

Hi Adam,

On 5/1/07, Le_Vert Adam Cécile wrote:
* Package name : apacheds
* URL : http://directory.apache.org/
Description : Directory server (LDAP) by the Apache Foundation
Maybe pkg-java could check and package apacheDS ?



Yes, it's a very good idea that pkg-java takes care of the package.
I'd like to do it myself but I have other bugs pending at the moment
and not that much time.

If someone of the team wants to handle it, no problem. If I have some
time, I'll retitle the bug and change the owner to myself.

Maybe we should create apacheds1.0 and apacheds1.5 packages, to handle
both stable and unstable branches.



Let's begin with the stable branch, but yes, apacheds1.0 and
apacheds1.5 seems resonable names.

Anyone interested by this package?

Cheers,

Arnaud Vandyck
email Follow the discussion Replies Reply to this message
Help Create a new topicReplies Make a reply
Search Make your own search