How COLA Linvocates Can Get Their Credibility Back.

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 04:28:32 -0400, Big Bertha wrote:

1. Denounce the obvious liars.

You mean Hadron, Snit, Ezekiel, flatline and his legion of nyms
(ahem)? Done and done. Thanks for the advice.

On 2011-08-28, the following emerged from the brain of RonB:

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 04:28:32 -0400, Big Bertha wrote:

1. Denounce the obvious liars.

You mean Hadron, Snit, Ezekiel, flatline and his legion of nyms
(ahem)? Done and done. Thanks for the advice.

OMG, you said about the same as I did! This means we *are* a 'herd'
indeed! Oh no!

*feeling bad*

Big Bertha stated in post j3d301$5tg$ on 8/28/11 2:48
AM:

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:40:18 +0200, TomB wrote:

Big Bertha wrote:

1. Denounce the obvious liars.

Okay. I denounce flatfish, hadron, snit, clogwog and some other
that don't come to mind right away.

Typical snip and run. No surprise as TomB is a card carrying
member of the herd.

Hey TomB, why not stop trying to pretend you are really unbiased
and just go with what you feel, which is following the herd. You
really aren't fooling anyone with your middle of the line approach.

He sometimes does dare to think on this own... but the herd gets
angry and he steps back into line.

On 2011-08-28, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:

Big Bertha stated in post j3d301$5tg$ on 8/28/11 2:48
AM:

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:40:18 +0200, TomB wrote:

Big Bertha wrote:

1. Denounce the obvious liars.

Okay. I denounce flatfish, hadron, snit, clogwog and some other
that don't come to mind right away.

Typical snip and run. No surprise as TomB is a card carrying
member of the herd.

Hey TomB, why not stop trying to pretend you are really unbiased
and just go with what you feel, which is following the herd. You
really aren't fooling anyone with your middle of the line approach.

He sometimes does dare to think on this own... but the herd gets
angry and he steps back into line.

Ok, little breach here, but this one's too good.

Show me - black on white - where I went against this so-called 'herd',
causing them to get angry at me, resulting in me 'stepping back into
line'.

If you cannot, you were lying and I was right in mentioning you as one
of the 'obvious liars'.

Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

On 08/28/2011 07:48 PM, Snit wrote:

chris stated in post j3dq1e$l7h$ on
8/28/11 9:22 AM:

No.

One example:

Big Bertha wrote:

Look up and research each and every claim that Roy Schestowitz
makes. Check the links for accuracy and if they refer back to his
own site or posts then ask for further proof.

I don't need to do that to "get back" my credibility. I am not responsible
for what Roy writes. Roy is.
I may not even read most of what he writes. So what? Am I not credible for
not taking part in the massive time waste you suggest?

If he ignores or
refuses then publicly bin him.

You are free to do this, but how would it make you less credible not doing
it?
I mean, I am not the one suggesting this. But what do you do to be credible
following your suggestions? Have you looked up and researched every claim
the trolls here make? No?

Ok, I can see not looking up his every claim... but when he is proved wrong,
why not acknowledge it?

I really should take time to read Roy's site, because it pisses you off
so much...

One thing I spotted at the site earlier was that Linspire boss went to
work for MS. Nice...