Microsoft and Nokia shills caught astroturfing again
December 24th, 2011 - 12:19 am ET by Homer | Report spam
Busted:
[quote]
Last Friday, I wrote an article about the newly launched Nokia Lumia
800. The article was aimed to educate and inform readers and buyers
about this latest smartphone from Nokia so that they could make a smart
decision. However, this review ruffled some feathers and we saw an
orchestrated pile of comments. The common factor in all these comments
was use of abusive language that explains the motive.
However, the surprise came when I decided to check the origin of these
comments. The first comments that appeared were posted by none other
than the employees and associates of Nokia and Microsoft. Especially one
commentator, Harish, who later realised his mistake of posting comment
from his official IP address (from India) and changed it later, is the
one who had written the maximum (nine so far) abusive posts. I wonder,
if this is called good PR practice at Nokia and whether they believe
that everything can be bought like the ad-extravaganza they created in
newspapers and TV channels?
[/quote]
http://www.moneylife.in/article/nok...22283.html
The trolls in COLA scoff at the suggestion they're also hired shills,
but clearly this is fairly common. In fact I'd bet most pro-Microsoft
nastygrams on the Web come directly from Microsoft. Average Joe knows
too little about GNU/Linux to really care, certainly not to the point
of launching a vicious tirade against it. Most Android users probably
don't even know its Linux underneath, and Windows users merely endure
the daily rigours of Windows, they're disinclined to "evangelise" it.
So who are these vicious attack dogs, that spring-up in such a timely
fashion, every time someone writes anything negative about Microsoft,
it's products or "partners", or anything positive about GNU/Linux?
[quote]
Waggener Edstrom Worldwide Rapid Response Team
...
Burson-Marsteller
Washington, DC
[/quote]
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/...tacts.mspx
Waggener Edstrom explains its "Perception Management" services:
[transcript]
Uncontrolled buzz can dramatically change perceptions of your brand.
...
The Narrative Network mines online dialogue and traditional media, even
foreign language media, for mentions of your brand, your company, your
key executives and your competitors. Then using a social networking
algorithm, it associates what they say about your brand.
...
While we monitor your narrative network over time, or before and after a
product launch or PR announcement, we will find new branches of a story
[graphic flashes the phrase "Negative PR"].
This allows us to measure effectiveness of the PR messaging, and insert
new messages or themes into your brand storyline, and deploy the right
resources to keep the story on message, or adjust tactics to manage
perceptions.
[/transcript]
http://www.waggeneredstrom.com/nn/demo/index.html
And as for Microsoft's other shill agency, Burson-Marsteller:
[quote]
BUSTED: It Was FACEBOOK That Hired A Former CNBC Reporter To Spread Lies
About Google
The social network secretly hired a PR firm to plant negative stories
about the search giant, The Daily Beast's Dan Lyons reveals—a caper that
is blowing up in their face, and escalating their war.
For the past few days, a mystery has been unfolding in Silicon Valley.
Somebody, it seems, hired Burson-Marsteller, a top public-relations
firm, to pitch anti-Google stories to newspapers, urging them to
investigate claims that Google was invading people’s privacy. Burson
even offered to help an influential blogger write a Google-bashing
op-ed, which it promised it could place in outlets like The Washington
Post, Politico, and The Huffington Post.
The plot backfired when the blogger turned down Burson’s offer and
posted the emails that Burson had sent him. It got worse when USA Today
broke a story accusing Burson of spreading a “whisper campaign” about
Google “on behalf of an unnamed client.”
[/quote]
http://www.businessinsider.com/face...ies-2011-5
And who is Facebook's closest ally?
[quote]
As Google grows ever more powerful in techdom, and Microsoft's influence
slips, the Redmond software giant is building closer and closer ties to
Facebook. The Facebook-Skype deal today is more evidence that Microsoft
and Facebook are in lockstep as they fight their mutual foe, Google. And
it comes even while Microsoft awaits regulatory approval to conclude its
Skype acquisition.
[/quote]
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-2...nvestment/
Clearly we're well beyond the point of having to debate whether or not
Microsoft astroturfing is a "conspiracy theory". It's a palpable fact.
But none of the above surprises me in the least, it's just nice to see
it spelled out in black and white now and then, to vindicate the stand
against gangsters like Microsoft.
K. | "UNIX is basically a simple operating
http://slated.org | system, but you have to be a genius
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on šky | to understand the simplicity"
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 214 days | ~ Dennis Ritchie
[quote]
Last Friday, I wrote an article about the newly launched Nokia Lumia
800. The article was aimed to educate and inform readers and buyers
about this latest smartphone from Nokia so that they could make a smart
decision. However, this review ruffled some feathers and we saw an
orchestrated pile of comments. The common factor in all these comments
was use of abusive language that explains the motive.
However, the surprise came when I decided to check the origin of these
comments. The first comments that appeared were posted by none other
than the employees and associates of Nokia and Microsoft. Especially one
commentator, Harish, who later realised his mistake of posting comment
from his official IP address (from India) and changed it later, is the
one who had written the maximum (nine so far) abusive posts. I wonder,
if this is called good PR practice at Nokia and whether they believe
that everything can be bought like the ad-extravaganza they created in
newspapers and TV channels?
[/quote]
http://www.moneylife.in/article/nok...22283.html
The trolls in COLA scoff at the suggestion they're also hired shills,
but clearly this is fairly common. In fact I'd bet most pro-Microsoft
nastygrams on the Web come directly from Microsoft. Average Joe knows
too little about GNU/Linux to really care, certainly not to the point
of launching a vicious tirade against it. Most Android users probably
don't even know its Linux underneath, and Windows users merely endure
the daily rigours of Windows, they're disinclined to "evangelise" it.
So who are these vicious attack dogs, that spring-up in such a timely
fashion, every time someone writes anything negative about Microsoft,
it's products or "partners", or anything positive about GNU/Linux?
[quote]
Waggener Edstrom Worldwide Rapid Response Team
...
Burson-Marsteller
Washington, DC
[/quote]
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/...tacts.mspx
Waggener Edstrom explains its "Perception Management" services:
[transcript]
Uncontrolled buzz can dramatically change perceptions of your brand.
...
The Narrative Network mines online dialogue and traditional media, even
foreign language media, for mentions of your brand, your company, your
key executives and your competitors. Then using a social networking
algorithm, it associates what they say about your brand.
...
While we monitor your narrative network over time, or before and after a
product launch or PR announcement, we will find new branches of a story
[graphic flashes the phrase "Negative PR"].
This allows us to measure effectiveness of the PR messaging, and insert
new messages or themes into your brand storyline, and deploy the right
resources to keep the story on message, or adjust tactics to manage
perceptions.
[/transcript]
http://www.waggeneredstrom.com/nn/demo/index.html
And as for Microsoft's other shill agency, Burson-Marsteller:
[quote]
BUSTED: It Was FACEBOOK That Hired A Former CNBC Reporter To Spread Lies
About Google
The social network secretly hired a PR firm to plant negative stories
about the search giant, The Daily Beast's Dan Lyons reveals—a caper that
is blowing up in their face, and escalating their war.
For the past few days, a mystery has been unfolding in Silicon Valley.
Somebody, it seems, hired Burson-Marsteller, a top public-relations
firm, to pitch anti-Google stories to newspapers, urging them to
investigate claims that Google was invading people’s privacy. Burson
even offered to help an influential blogger write a Google-bashing
op-ed, which it promised it could place in outlets like The Washington
Post, Politico, and The Huffington Post.
The plot backfired when the blogger turned down Burson’s offer and
posted the emails that Burson had sent him. It got worse when USA Today
broke a story accusing Burson of spreading a “whisper campaign” about
Google “on behalf of an unnamed client.”
[/quote]
http://www.businessinsider.com/face...ies-2011-5
And who is Facebook's closest ally?
[quote]
As Google grows ever more powerful in techdom, and Microsoft's influence
slips, the Redmond software giant is building closer and closer ties to
Facebook. The Facebook-Skype deal today is more evidence that Microsoft
and Facebook are in lockstep as they fight their mutual foe, Google. And
it comes even while Microsoft awaits regulatory approval to conclude its
Skype acquisition.
[/quote]
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-2...nvestment/
Clearly we're well beyond the point of having to debate whether or not
Microsoft astroturfing is a "conspiracy theory". It's a palpable fact.
But none of the above surprises me in the least, it's just nice to see
it spelled out in black and white now and then, to vindicate the stand
against gangsters like Microsoft.
K. | "UNIX is basically a simple operating
http://slated.org | system, but you have to be a genius
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on šky | to understand the simplicity"
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 214 days | ~ Dennis Ritchie
Similar topics
Make your own search
Tags
Create a new topic
Follow the discussion
3 replies
Make a reply
May 25th, 2013 - 11:40 AM ET
Join now


Replies