[PATCH 1/2] [v3] powerpc/44x: Fix PCI MSI support for Maui APM821xx SoC and Bluestone board

March 12th, 2012 - 03:10 am ET by Mai La | Report spam
This patch consists of:
- Enable PCI MSI as default for Bluestone board
- Change definition of number of MSI interrupt as it depends on SoC
- Fix returning ENODEV as finding MSI node
- Fix MSI physical high and low address
- Keep MSI data logically

Signed-off-by: Mai La <mla@apm.com>


v3:
* Use upper_32_bits() / lower_32_bits() consistently as Wolfgang Denk recomments
v2:
* Change definition of number of MSI interrupt from config to count interrupts in device tree


arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig | 2 +
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig
index fcf6bf2..9f04ce3 100644
a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ config BLUESTONE
default n
select PPC44x_SIMPLE
select APM821xx
+ select PCI_MSI
+ select PPC4xx_MSI
select IBM_EMAC_RGMII
help
This option enables support for the APM APM821xx Evaluation board.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c
index 1c2d7af..63989d0 100644
a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c
@@ -28,10 +28,11 @@
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <asm/prom.h>
#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
#include <asm/ppc-pci.h>
-#include <boot/dcr.h>
+#include <asm/dcr.h>
#include <asm/dcr-regs.h>
#include <asm/msi_bitmap.h>

@@ -43,13 +44,14 @@
#define PEIH_FLUSH0 0x30
#define PEIH_FLUSH1 0x38
#define PEIH_CNTRST 0x48
-#define NR_MSI_IRQS 4
+
+int msi_irqs;

struct ppc4xx_msi {
u32 msi_addr_lo;
u32 msi_addr_hi;
void __iomem *msi_regs;
- int msi_virqs[NR_MSI_IRQS];
+ int *msi_virqs;
struct msi_bitmap bitmap;
struct device_node *msi_dev;
};
@@ -61,7 +63,7 @@ static int ppc4xx_msi_init_allocator(struct platform_device *dev,
{
int err;

- err = msi_bitmap_alloc(&msi_data->bitmap, NR_MSI_IRQS,
+ err = msi_bitmap_alloc(&msi_data->bitmap, msi_irqs,
dev->dev.of_node);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -83,6 +85,9 @@ static int ppc4xx_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
struct msi_desc *entry;
struct ppc4xx_msi *msi_data = &ppc4xx_msi;

+ msi_data->msi_virqs = kmalloc((msi_irqs) * sizeof(int),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+
list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
int_no = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&msi_data->bitmap, 1);
if (int_no >= 0)
@@ -150,12 +155,11 @@ static int ppc4xx_setup_pcieh_hw(struct platform_device *dev,
if (!sdr_addr)
return -1;

- SDR0_WRITE(sdr_addr, (u64)res.start >> 32); /*HIGH addr */
- SDR0_WRITE(sdr_addr + 1, res.start & 0xFFFFFFFF); /* Low addr */
-
+ mtdcri(SDR0, *sdr_addr, upper_32_bits(res.start)); /*HIGH addr */
+ mtdcri(SDR0, *sdr_addr + 1, lower_32_bits(res.start)); /* Low addr */

msi->msi_dev = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "ppc4xx-msi");
- if (msi->msi_dev)
+ if (!msi->msi_dev)
return -ENODEV;

msi->msi_regs = of_iomap(msi->msi_dev, 0);
@@ -167,9 +171,12 @@ static int ppc4xx_setup_pcieh_hw(struct platform_device *dev,
(u32) (msi->msi_regs + PEIH_TERMADH), (u32) (msi->msi_regs));

msi_virt = dma_alloc_coherent(&dev->dev, 64, &msi_phys, GFP_KERNEL);
- msi->msi_addr_hi = 0x0;
- msi->msi_addr_lo = (u32) msi_phys;
- dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "PCIE-MSI: msi address 0x%x", msi->msi_addr_lo);
+ if (!msi_virt)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ msi->msi_addr_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_phys);
+ msi->msi_addr_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_phys);
+ dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "PCIE-MSI: msi address high 0x%x, low 0x%x",
+ msi->msi_addr_hi, msi->msi_addr_lo);

/* Progam the Interrupt handler Termination addr registers */
out_be32(msi->msi_regs + PEIH_TERMADH, msi->msi_addr_hi);
@@ -185,6 +192,8 @@ static int ppc4xx_setup_pcieh_hw(struct platform_device *dev,
out_be32(msi->msi_regs + PEIH_MSIED, *msi_data);
out_be32(msi->msi_regs + PEIH_MSIMK, *msi_mask);

+ dma_free_coherent(&dev->dev, 64, msi_virt, msi_phys);
+
return 0;
}

@@ -194,7 +203,7 @@ static int ppc4xx_of_msi_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
int i;
int virq;

- for (i = 0; i < NR_MSI_IRQS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < msi_irqs; i++) {
virq = msi->msi_virqs[i];
if (virq != NO_IRQ)
irq_dispose_mapping(virq);
@@ -215,8 +224,6 @@ static int __devinit ppc4xx_msi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
struct resource res;
int err = 0;

- msi = &ppc4xx_msi;/*keep the msi data for further use*/
-
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "PCIE-MSI: Setting up MSI support...");

msi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ppc4xx_msi), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -234,6 +241,10 @@ static int __devinit ppc4xx_msi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
goto error_out;
}

+ msi_irqs = of_irq_count(dev->dev.of_node);
+ if (!msi_irqs)
+ return -1;
+
if (ppc4xx_setup_pcieh_hw(dev, res, msi))
goto error_out;

@@ -242,6 +253,7 @@ static int __devinit ppc4xx_msi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
dev_err(&dev->dev, "Error allocating MSI bitmap");
goto error_out;
}
+ ppc4xx_msi = *msi;

ppc_md.setup_msi_irqs = ppc4xx_setup_msi_irqs;
ppc_md.teardown_msi_irqs = ppc4xx_teardown_msi_irqs;
1.7.3.4

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
email Follow the discussionReplies 1 replyReplies Make a reply

Similar topics

Replies

#1 Josh Boyer
March 16th, 2012 - 07:50 am ET | Report spam
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Mai La wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c
index 1c2d7af..63989d0 100644
a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c
@@ -28,10 +28,11 @@
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <asm/prom.h>
 #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
 #include <asm/ppc-pci.h>
-#include <boot/dcr.h>
+#include <asm/dcr.h>
 #include <asm/dcr-regs.h>
 #include <asm/msi_bitmap.h>

@@ -43,13 +44,14 @@
 #define PEIH_FLUSH0    0x30
 #define PEIH_FLUSH1    0x38
 #define PEIH_CNTRST    0x48
-#define NR_MSI_IRQS    4
+
+int msi_irqs;



This should be static.

 struct ppc4xx_msi {
       u32 msi_addr_lo;
       u32 msi_addr_hi;
       void __iomem *msi_regs;
-       int msi_virqs[NR_MSI_IRQS];
+       int *msi_virqs;
       struct msi_bitmap bitmap;
       struct device_node *msi_dev;
 };
@@ -61,7 +63,7 @@ static int ppc4xx_msi_init_allocator(struct platform_device *dev,
 {
       int err;

-       err = msi_bitmap_alloc(&msi_data->bitmap, NR_MSI_IRQS,
+       err = msi_bitmap_alloc(&msi_data->bitmap, msi_irqs,
                             dev->dev.of_node);
       if (err)
               return err;
@@ -83,6 +85,9 @@ static int ppc4xx_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
       struct msi_desc *entry;
       struct ppc4xx_msi *msi_data = &ppc4xx_msi;

+       msi_data->msi_virqs = kmalloc((msi_irqs) * sizeof(int),
+                                           GFP_KERNEL);
+



What happens if this allocation fails? Unlikely perhaps, but we should still
probably try and handle the error.

       list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
               int_no = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&msi_data->bitmap, 1);
               if (int_no >= 0)



<snip>

@@ -234,6 +241,10 @@ static int __devinit ppc4xx_msi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
               goto error_out;
       }

+       msi_irqs = of_irq_count(dev->dev.of_node);
+       if (!msi_irqs)
+               return -1;
+



Maybe return -ENODEV here instead of -1? It probably doesn't matter at the
moment, but if anything actually checked why the probe function failed, that
would be more descriptive.

josh
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
email Follow the discussion Replies Reply to this message
Help Create a new topicReplies Make a reply
Search Make your own search