RE: [gentoo-user] Anyone have any trouble with rc_parallel="YES" ?

July 19th, 2011 - 06:50 am ET by Pandu Poluan | Report spam
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone have any trouble with rc_parallel="YES" ?
From: Jesús J. Guerrero Botella <jesus.guerrero.botella@gmail.com>
Date: 2011-07-19 15:02


2011/7/19 Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>:

Spelunking in /etc/rc.conf, I found the rc_parallel setting,
accompanied with a quite significant WARNING.

Have anyone experienced any trouble setting rc_parallel to "YES"?



Obviously, the answer to this is "YES". If no one had a problem with
this, first, there wouldn't be a warning; and second, it would be
enabled by default. Sure that some people use it without much problem,
but if you enable it, be sure to keep it in your mind that you enabled
it, and disable it if you have problems before opening any bug report
having to do with system services and/or the init process.



You indeed are pedantically correct :-)

If I may rephrase my question, I'd write: Have anyone in this list experienced any trouble setting rc_parallel to 'yes' ;-)


In any case, placebo effects aside as always, all you'll gain from
this will be a couple of seconds.



In my case, I have to start eth0 to eth5 (yes, 6 eth's), and the speedup is quite significant :-)


Rgds,
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~

Sent from Nokia E72-1
email Follow the discussionReplies 2 repliesReplies Make a reply

Similar topics

Replies

#1 Jesús J. Guerrero Botella
July 19th, 2011 - 07:00 am ET | Report spam
2011/7/19 Pandu Poluan :
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone have any trouble with rc_parallel="YES" ?
From: Jesús J. Guerrero Botella
Date: 2011-07-19 15:02

2011/7/19 Pandu Poluan :
Spelunking in /etc/rc.conf, I found the rc_parallel setting,
accompanied with a quite significant WARNING.

Have anyone experienced any trouble setting rc_parallel to "YES"?



Obviously, the answer to this is "YES". If no one had a problem with
this, first, there wouldn't be a warning; and second, it would be
enabled by default. Sure that some people use it without much problem,
but if you enable it, be sure to keep it in your mind that you enabled
it, and disable it if you have problems before opening any bug report
having to do with system services and/or the init process.



You indeed are pedantically correct :-)

If I may rephrase my question, I'd write: Have anyone in this list experienced any trouble setting rc_parallel to 'yes' ;-)



My answer would still be yes, though I can't remember the details, I
have had issues with this in several occasions, maybe five or six (all
the times I've tried this feature since I started using Gentoo, like a
decade ago). So, it's a feature that has always been broken, in all
the stable and experimental init systems that Gentoo has had since it
was born.

I hope that can give you a better overview on what I meant above.

In any case, placebo effects aside as always, all you'll gain from
this will be a couple of seconds.



In my case, I have to start eth0 to eth5 (yes, 6 eth's), and the speedup is quite significant :-)



In that case, maybe systemd or a custom init script (even something
simple in local.start) could greatly improve your boot time without
breaking it. I don't mean you shouldn't use that feature though, I
just mean that you should be vigilant if you use it. It might just
work for your particular configuration, but it might also break at any
random moment tomorrow so you'll need to keep an eye on it and remind
to turn it off if some paranormal activity is detected in your machine
or something happens to your kittens. :)

Jesús Guerrero Botella
Replies Reply to this message
#2 Thanasis
July 19th, 2011 - 07:30 am ET | Report spam
on 07/19/2011 01:39 PM Pandu Poluan wrote the following:
In my case, I have to start eth0 to eth5 (yes, 6 eth's), and the speedup is quite significant



set rc_depend_strict="NO" in /etc/rc.conf
email Follow the discussion Replies Reply to this message
Help Create a new topicReplies Make a reply
Search Make your own search