Windows vs. Android: Does Desktop Linux Win?

June 28th, 2012 - 02:49 pm ET by Hardon | Report spam
<http://fossforce.com/2012/06/window...x-win/>

<quote>
Every tech writer on the Internet seems to want to be the one to crack
the code and figure out what Microsoft plans to do with Surface. I
thought I was one of them until I spent three days trying to write
this article. I’ve come to the conclusion that I don’t really care
what Microsoft’s plans are or if they’ll pan-out for them. They bore
me. They’re irrelevant now.

I suspect we’re getting ready to see if they’re nimble enough to
completely reshape their business model, much like IBM had to do more
than a decade ago. Who knows what they’re going to do, now that they
obviously recognizethe-proprietary-operating-system-as-a-billion-dollar-
property model has reached its sunset years?
</quote>

Gods are fragile things; they may be killed by a whiff of science or
a dose of common sense.
- Chapman Cohen
email Follow the discussionReplies 10 repliesReplies Make a reply

Similar topics

Replies

#1 Hadron
June 28th, 2012 - 03:10 pm ET | Report spam
Hardon writes:

<http://fossforce.com/2012/06/window...x-win/>

<quote>
Every tech writer on the Internet seems to want to be the one to crack
the code and figure out what Microsoft plans to do with Surface. I
thought I was one of them until I spent three days trying to write
this article. I’ve come to the conclusion that I don’t really care
what Microsoft’s plans are or if they’ll pan-out for them. They bore
me. They’re irrelevant now.

I suspect we’re getting ready to see if they’re nimble enough to
completely reshape their business model, much like IBM had to do more
than a decade ago. Who knows what they’re going to do, now that they
obviously recognizethe-proprietary-operating-system-as-a-billion-dollar-
property model has reached its sunset years?
</quote>



Not one piece of that made any sense.


A certain COLA "advocate" faking his user-agent in order to pretend to be a Linux
user: User-Agent: Outlook 5.5 (WinNT 5.0), User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0
(Linux), Message-ID:
Replies Reply to this message
#2 Big Steel
June 28th, 2012 - 04:18 pm ET | Report spam
On 6/28/2012 2:49 PM, Hardon wrote:
<http://fossforce.com/2012/06/window...x-win/>

<quote>
Every tech writer on the Internet seems to want to be the one to crack
the code and figure out what Microsoft plans to do with Surface. I
thought I was one of them until I spent three days trying to write
this article. I’ve come to the conclusion that I don’t really care
what Microsoft’s plans are or if they’ll pan-out for them. They bore
me. They’re irrelevant now.

I suspect we’re getting ready to see if they’re nimble enough to
completely reshape their business model, much like IBM had to do more
than a decade ago. Who knows what they’re going to do, now that they
obviously recognizethe-proprietary-operating-system-as-a-billion-dollar-
property model has reached its sunset years?
</quote>




The insanity of Linux users in all of their glory. It's kind of like the
Republicans and their health care reform babble that was struck down.
Replies Reply to this message
#3 Chris Ahlstrom
June 28th, 2012 - 05:21 pm ET | Report spam
After swilling some grog, Hardon belched this bit o' wisdom:

<http://fossforce.com/2012/06/window...x-win/>

<quote>
Every tech writer on the Internet seems to want to be the one to crack
the code and figure out what Microsoft plans to do with Surface. I
thought I was one of them until I spent three days trying to write
this article. I’ve come to the conclusion that I don’t really care
what Microsoft’s plans are or if they’ll pan-out for them. They bore
me. They’re irrelevant now.

I suspect we’re getting ready to see if they’re nimble enough to
completely reshape their business model, much like IBM had to do more
than a decade ago. Who knows what they’re going to do, now that they
obviously recognizethe-proprietary-operating-system-as-a-billion-dollar-
property model has reached its sunset years?
</quote>



Just what kind of “new” Microsoft are they intending to build? Again,
who knows? They seem to be trying-out everybody else’s business plan.

Well, since their original "we'll license it by volume and make sure
we have a big carrot and a big stick to use on the OEMs" model, what
else have they had but copycat? Unless, of course, you count "buy it
up".

We want to urge all system builders — indeed, all Partners — not to supply
naked PCs. It is a risk to your customers and a risk to your business — with
specifically 5 percent fewer opportunities to market software and services.
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/desktop...-39261437/
Replies Reply to this message
#4 Hadron
June 28th, 2012 - 07:41 pm ET | Report spam
Chris Ahlstrom writes:

After swilling some grog, Hardon belched this bit o' wisdom:

<http://fossforce.com/2012/06/window...x-win/>

<quote>
Every tech writer on the Internet seems to want to be the one to crack
the code and figure out what Microsoft plans to do with Surface. I
thought I was one of them until I spent three days trying to write
this article. I’ve come to the conclusion that I don’t really care
what Microsoft’s plans are or if they’ll pan-out for them. They bore
me. They’re irrelevant now.

I suspect we’re getting ready to see if they’re nimble enough to
completely reshape their business model, much like IBM had to do more
than a decade ago. Who knows what they’re going to do, now that they
obviously recognizethe-proprietary-operating-system-as-a-billion-dollar-
property model has reached its sunset years?
</quote>



Just what kind of “new” Microsoft are they intending to build? Again,
who knows? They seem to be trying-out everybody else’s business plan.

Well, since their original "we'll license it by volume and make sure
we have a big carrot and a big stick to use on the OEMs" model, what
else have they had but copycat? Unless, of course, you count "buy it
up".



How does the company that pays you, Creepy, market their SW that you gladly
QA and go on to boast about the income it provides?

A certain COLA "advocate" faking his user-agent in order to pretend to be a Linux
user: User-Agent: Outlook 5.5 (WinNT 5.0), User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0
(Linux), Message-ID:
Replies Reply to this message
#5 Hadron
June 28th, 2012 - 07:48 pm ET | Report spam
Hadron writes:

Chris Ahlstrom writes:

After swilling some grog, Hardon belched this bit o' wisdom:

<http://fossforce.com/2012/06/window...x-win/>

<quote>
Every tech writer on the Internet seems to want to be the one to crack
the code and figure out what Microsoft plans to do with Surface. I
thought I was one of them until I spent three days trying to write
this article. I’ve come to the conclusion that I don’t really care
what Microsoft’s plans are or if they’ll pan-out for them. They bore
me. They’re irrelevant now.

I suspect we’re getting ready to see if they’re nimble enough to
completely reshape their business model, much like IBM had to do more
than a decade ago. Who knows what they’re going to do, now that they
obviously recognizethe-proprietary-operating-system-as-a-billion-dollar-
property model has reached its sunset years?
</quote>



Just what kind of “new” Microsoft are they intending to build? Again,
who knows? They seem to be trying-out everybody else’s business plan.

Well, since their original "we'll license it by volume and make sure
we have a big carrot and a big stick to use on the OEMs" model, what
else have they had but copycat? Unless, of course, you count "buy it
up".



How does the company that pays you, Creepy, market their SW that you gladly
QA and go on to boast about the income it provides?



Not when it enables people to post links to Creepy boasting about his
Windows income (when he denied it) or calling people "fuckheads" and
"cunts".

A certain COLA "advocate" faking his user-agent in order to pretend to be a Linux
user: User-Agent: Outlook 5.5 (WinNT 5.0), User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0
(Linux), Message-ID:
Replies Reply to this message
Help Create a new topicNext page Replies Make a reply
Search Make your own search