Bug#613491: removal of gdm was a huge mistake

March 13th, 2011 - 02:50 am ET by Craig Sanders | Report spam
reopen 613491
thanks

i only noticed a few days ago when i built a new debian desktop system
that gdm is no longer available, in favour of gdm3.

gdm3 is NOT an adequate replacement for gdm. useful features that are
readily apparent and easily configurable in gdm are either missing
completely or hidden in gdm3.

compare, for instance, the configuration options in the
System->Administration->Login Window dialog for gdm vs the nearly
useless equivalent dialog for gdm3.

even figuring out something simple, like how to disable the
privacy-infringing & security-reducing user list(*) on the
login screen is beyond the average user that the cretinous
over-simplification trend of gnome "improvements" is supposed
to cater for. How many of them are going to figure out that
you need to edit /etc/gdm3/greeter.gconf-defaults and add
"/apps/gdm/simple-greeter/disable_user_list true"?

(*) the fact that Apple does it with Mac OS X and Microsoft does it
with Windows does not make it a good idea or worthy of copying as the
default. it takes away one of the things (the username) that someone
needs to know in order to compromise an account on the system, so
two-factor auth is now reduced to one-factor.


and more complicated options like setting a timed or automatic login
(useful e.g. for setting up an "appliance" like a mythtv frontend, to
have it auto-login to the mythtv user) will be essentially impossible
for the avg user.

and HTF do you change the background image and "theme" for the login
screen? i can't figure it out, nor do i want to have to spend hours
hunting for a hint in the woefully incomplete and generally abysmal
quality gnome documentation.

all of these options and more are easily available and *OBVIOUS* in the
old gdm Login Window preferences dialog. and completely missing from the
gdm3 dialog. WTF?

upgrades are supposed to bring *improvements*, not massive regressions.


OK, the actual issues here are Gnome's fault but prematurely removing
gdm from debian is debian's fault.

(and yes, i am annoyed...but my annoyance is with the Gnome devs who
seem determined to take what WAS shaping up to be a good desktop
environment and turning it into a steaming turd. debian can and should
be making more of an effort to insulate users from dumb upstream
decisions)

craig

craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>



To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
email Follow the discussionReplies 6 repliesReplies Make a reply

Replies

#1 Craig Sanders
March 13th, 2011 - 04:40 pm ET | Report spam
reopen 613491
thanks

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 02:54:12PM +0000, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On -10/01/37 20:59, Craig Sanders wrote:
> reopen 613491
> thanks

Reopening RM bugs is pointless... we can't remove a package twice :)



the point is that it shouldn't have been removed.

undo, rather than redo.

> gdm3 is NOT an adequate replacement for gdm. useful features that are
> readily apparent and easily configurable in gdm are either missing
> completely or hidden in gdm3.

File bugs (ideally upstream).



pointless. gnome's obsession with over-simplification of software is
exceeded only by their refusal to see any other POV, their willingness
to censor/delete bug reports that point out the problems caused by their
short-sighted decisions and ban from their bugzilla people who submit
them.

> OK, the actual issues here are Gnome's fault but prematurely removing
> gdm from debian is debian's fault.

No, it's not.



yes it is. was there any actual need to remove gdm? it has existed in
the debian repository alongside gdm3 for ages. it doesn't conflict with
the current gnome libs (it's still installed and working on systems
built before gdm was removed).

You have three options. Fork gdm, become upstream for it, and get it packaged.



why should that be necessary? gdmm still works, there was no need to remove it.

Help improve gdm3.



impossible. would conflict with the gnome obsession with over-simplification
and cretinisation of software.

Or switch to something else.



what else?

kdm? i don't want to have all the kde libraries running as well as the gnome
libraries just to have a login screen.

xdm, or wdm? ancient - are they even maintained upstream any more? do
they offer a choice of window manager and/or session manager at login
time?

slim? that's even more minimalist than gdm3.

so your suggestion to work around the fact that gdm3 is an inadequate replacement
for gdm is to use some other inadequate replacement for gdm.


i prefer option four: submit a bug report to debian saying that the removal of
gdm from debian was a mistake and should be reversed.


craig

craig sanders



To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Similar topics