Tags Tags

Bug#624361: /usr/lib/lazarus/0.9.30/lazbuild: lazbuild should probably depend on fp-utils

April 27th, 2011 - 03:50 pm ET by Paul Gevers | Report spam
Help Create a new topic
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)

Package: lcl-utils-0.9.30
Version: 0.9.30-1
Severity: important

My package winff, which builds using lazbuild recently fails to build
from source [1][2], with the following error:

winff.lpr(48,1) Error: resource compiler "fpcres" not found, switching
to external mode

After installing fp-utils, which contains fpcres, my build works fine,
so I think the package containing lazbuild should depend on fp-utils. Or
maybe some other package in the dependency tree.

[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fe...1303151272
[2]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fe...1303136092

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set
to C)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lcl-utils-0.9.30 depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.38 Debian configuration
management sy
ii fp-compiler 2.4.2-3 Free Pascal - Compiler
metapackage
ii fp-compiler-2.4.2 [fp-compile 2.4.2-3 Free Pascal - Compiler
ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library:
Shared lib

Versions of packages lcl-utils-0.9.30 recommends:
pn lazarus-ide-0.9.30 <none> (no description available)
ii lcl-0.9.30 0.9.30-1 Lazarus Components Library
- LCL m
ii lcl-units-0.9.30 [lcl-0.9.30] 0.9.30-1 Lazarus Components Library
- Backe

lcl-utils-0.9.30 suggests no packages.

lcl-utils-0.9.30/rename_cfg: true







To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
email Follow the discussionReplies 2 repliesReplies Make a reply

Replies

#1 Abou Al Montacir
April 28th, 2011 - 08:10 am ET | Report spam



I think that moving fpcres to fp-compiler is more consistent as the
compiler does not work anymore correctly without it. It should be
considered as an internal compiler tool rather than a helper tool. It
will also allow minimizing the compiler requirements.

What do you think?

Cheers,

On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 21:34 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:

Package: lcl-utils-0.9.30
Version: 0.9.30-1
Severity: important

My package winff, which builds using lazbuild recently fails to build
from source [1][2], with the following error:

winff.lpr(48,1) Error: resource compiler "fpcres" not found, switching
to external mode

After installing fp-utils, which contains fpcres, my build works fine,
so I think the package containing lazbuild should depend on fp-utils. Or
maybe some other package in the dependency tree.

[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fe...1303151272
[2]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fe...1303136092

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set
to C)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lcl-utils-0.9.30 depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.38 Debian configuration
management sy
ii fp-compiler 2.4.2-3 Free Pascal - Compiler
metapackage
ii fp-compiler-2.4.2 [fp-compile 2.4.2-3 Free Pascal - Compiler
ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library:
Shared lib

Versions of packages lcl-utils-0.9.30 recommends:
pn lazarus-ide-0.9.30 <none> (no description available)
ii lcl-0.9.30 0.9.30-1 Lazarus Components Library
- LCL m
ii lcl-units-0.9.30 [lcl-0.9.30] 0.9.30-1 Lazarus Components Library
- Backe

lcl-utils-0.9.30 suggests no packages.

lcl-utils-0.9.30/rename_cfg: true





<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.32.2">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
I think that moving fpcres to fp-compiler is more consistent as the compiler does not work anymore correctly without it. It should be considered as an internal compiler tool rather than a helper tool. It will also allow minimizing the compiler requirements.<BR>
<BR>
What do you think?<BR>
<BR>
Cheers,<BR>
<BR>
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 21:34 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
Package: lcl-utils-0.9.30
Version: 0.9.30-1
Severity: important

My package winff, which builds using lazbuild recently fails to build
from source [1][2], with the following error:

winff.lpr(48,1) Error: resource compiler &quot;fpcres&quot; not found, switching
to external mode

After installing fp-utils, which contains fpcres, my build works fine,
so I think the package containing lazbuild should depend on fp-utils. Or
maybe some other package in the dependency tree.

[1]
<A HREF="https://buildd.debian.org/status/fe...;>https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=winff&amp;arch=sparc&amp;ver=1.3.2-2&amp;stamp=1303151272</A>
[2]
<A HREF="https://buildd.debian.org/status/fe...;>https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=winff&amp;arch=powerpc&amp;ver=1.3.2-2&amp;stamp=1303136092</A>

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set
to C)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lcl-utils-0.9.30 depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.38 Debian configuration
management sy
ii fp-compiler 2.4.2-3 Free Pascal - Compiler
metapackage
ii fp-compiler-2.4.2 [fp-compile 2.4.2-3 Free Pascal - Compiler
ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library:
Shared lib

Versions of packages lcl-utils-0.9.30 recommends:
pn lazarus-ide-0.9.30 &lt;none&gt; (no description available)
ii lcl-0.9.30 0.9.30-1 Lazarus Components Library
- LCL m
ii lcl-units-0.9.30 [lcl-0.9.30] 0.9.30-1 Lazarus Components Library
- Backe

lcl-utils-0.9.30 suggests no packages.

lcl-utils-0.9.30/rename_cfg: true

</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>







To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Similar topics

Make your own search :