Bug#678904: bouncycastle: FTBFS with gcj

August 16th, 2012 - 06:40 pm ET by Damien Raude-Morvan | Report spam

reopen 678904
found 678904 1.46+dfsg-6
thanks

Hi,

It seems that bouncycastle still FTBFS with GCJ after 1.46+dfsg-6 upload.
However, this is a different failure :

[...]

[javac] 822. ERROR in /build/buildd-bouncycastle_1.46+dfsg-6-kfreebsd-
amd64-0I1Ozr/bouncycastle-1.46+dfsg/build/artifacts/jdk1.5/bcprov-
jdk15-146/src/org/bouncycastle/jce/ECPointUtil.java
[javac] (at line 3)
[javac] import java.security.spec.ECFieldF2m;
[javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[javac] The import java.security.spec.ECFieldF2m cannot be resolved

[...]

So there is some missing classes from GCJ classpath, like
java.security.spec.ECFieldF2m (linked to elliptic curve ciffer which is in JDK
API since 1.5).

For now, so you might to Build-Depends on default-jdk (>= 1:1.6) and request
removal of binaries on kfreebsd-*

Regards,
Damien - Debian Developper
http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan





To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
email Follow the discussionReplies 2 repliesReplies Make a reply

Replies

#1 owner
August 16th, 2012 - 06:40 pm ET | Report spam
Processing commands for :

reopen 678904


Bug #678904 {Done: Brian Thomason } [src:bouncycastle] bouncycastle: FTBFS with gcj
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions bouncycastle/1.46+dfsg-6.
found 678904 1.46+dfsg-6


Bug #678904 [src:bouncycastle] bouncycastle: FTBFS with gcj
Marked as found in versions bouncycastle/1.46+dfsg-6.
thanks


Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
678904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr...i?bugg8904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact with problems


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Similar topics