Bug#685096: cputable: add mips64 and mipsel64

August 16th, 2012 - 02:40 pm ET by shawn | Report spam
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

I ran into the lack of these entries when working on a clean way to have gcc-defaults
provide fully-qualfied compilers with multilib. (i686-linux-gnu on am64, e.g.)

commit 7f53efdf1d4a02de0f8677b51e7e01359e6c7708
Author: Shawn Landden <shawnlandden@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Aug 16 11:23:49 2012 -0700

cputable: add debian names mips64 and mipsel64

diff --git a/cputable b/cputable
index 28630f0..eff8109 100644
a/cputable
+++ b/cputable
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ m32r m32r m32r 32 big
m68k m68k m68k 32 big
mips mips mips(eb)? 32 big
mipsel mipsel mipsel 32 little
+mips64 mips64 mips(eb)?64 64 big
+mipsel64 mipsel64 mipsel64 64 little
powerpc powerpc (powerpc|ppc) 32 big
ppc64 powerpc64 (powerpc|ppc)64 64 big
s390 s390 s390 32 big

Debian Release: wheezy
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: armel (armv5tel)

Kernel: Linux 3.4.0-tomoyo-00006-gfd64aac (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-3
ii libc6 2.13-33
ii libgcc1 1:4.7.1-2
ii liblzma5 5.1.1alpha+20120614-1
ii libselinux1 2.1.9-5
ii tar 1.26-4em1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

dpkg recommends no packages.

Versions of packages dpkg suggests:
ii apt 0.9.7.2

/etc/logrotate.d/dpkg changed [not included]



To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
email Follow the discussionReplies 1 replyReplies Make a reply

Replies

#1 Guillem Jover
August 16th, 2012 - 04:40 pm ET | Report spam
Hi!

On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 18:27:17 +0000, shawn wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

I ran into the lack of these entries when working on a clean way to have
gcc-defaults provide fully-qualfied compilers with multilib.
(i686-linux-gnu on am64, e.g.)



Are you working on MIPS 64 bit ports or was this just spotting them
missing from the table? If the latter, I don't think it makes much
sense to add them for now if no one is working on such ports, there's
lots of missing cpus supported by say gcc that could be added too but
I'd rather see actual people interested in it request it instead.

thanks,
guillem


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Similar topics