DriveSavers Data Recovery, the worldwide leader in data
recovery services, announced today that the Ponemon
Institute, a privacy and information management research firm,
identifies in its second annual study, Trends in Security of Data
Recovery Operations, new potential threats to the security of
confidential and sensitive data when it is outsourced to third-party
data recovery vendors. As businesses and government organizations
increase their use of data recovery vendors, the potential for data
breach during the data recovery process also increases if the vendor’s
security protocols are not properly vetted.
“While the need to recover data is often time sensitive, every effort
must be made to ensure that the organization’s confidential and
sensitive data is protected during the recovery process,” said Michael
Hall, CISO at DriveSavers Data Recovery. “The consequence of using an
unscrupulous data recovery vendor can lead to loss or theft of sensitive
and confidential information. That could mean a major disruption in
business, financial loss and in some cases, closure of the business.”
Ponemon interviewed 769 IT security and IT support practitioners in US
healthcare, financial and government organizations, most of who report
to CIOs and CISOs. Here are the study highlights:
-
Increased Use of Third-Party Data Recovery Vendors (as often as
once a week) – Eighty-five percent of the respondents report their
organizations have used or will continue to use a third-party data
recovery service provider to recover lost data. This is an increase
from 79 percent in the previous study. In fact, 39 percent say they
use third parties at least once each week or more.
-
Loss of Business-critical Data Drives Use of Data Recovery Vendors
– Organizations most often use third party data recovery vendors when
intellectual property, financial information and customer/patient data
files have been lost. IT desktop and helpdesk support managers
typically select data recovery service providers. Mandated to close
job tickets fast, speed ranks higher than security in their selection
criterion according to the study.
-
IT Security Often Excluded from Data Recovery Vendor Selection
Process – Fifty-four percent of respondents confirmed that IT
security is excluded from selecting third-party data recovery
providers, which could play a role in IT support’s placement of speed
over security. Organizations admit that they need to improve their due
diligence for vetting third-party vendors and
their data recovery certification.
-
Data Breaches on the Rise at Data Recovery Vendors – Of the 87
percent of respondents who experienced a data breach in the past two
years, 21 percent say the breach occurred when a drive was in the
possession of a data recovery vendor. This is an increase from the
previous Ponemon study. Many respondents who experienced a data breach
during the data recovery process point to the vendor’s lack of
security protocols.
-
Unknown Whether Cloud Service Providers Would Report a Data
Loss/Recovery Incident – More than half of the surveyed
organizations use a cloud storage service provider. While 69 percent
of the respondents feel notification from the cloud provider should be
required if their servers crash and drives are outsourced for data
recovery, only a small percent (less than 10 percent) are confident
that their service provider would notify them if they engaged the
services of a data recovery provider. Fifty-seven percent are not
confident that they would be informed at all.
-
Leading Security Guidelines are not Considered When Selecting a
Data Recovery Provider – According to the study, 54 percent of
respondents do not require third-party data recovery vendors to comply
with leading security guidelines such National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and International
Organization of Standards for Business, Government and Society
(ISO).
Based on the Ponemon findings, organizations should have policy and
guidelines in place for selecting and using a data recovery service
provider. In addition, organizations need to address potential new
threats to the security of data during the data recovery process,
including business associate agreements for cloud storage providers that
outline the need for notification should a data loss occur and the
services of a data recovery vendor be engaged. Respondents of the
Ponemon studies developed a Data
Security Checklist for vetting third-party data recovery service
providers.
Healthcare organizations, government agencies and financial
organizations are required by law to meet the most stringent data
security guidelines and are now requiring third-party data recovery
vendors to meet these same guidelines. DriveSavers adheres to the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Data Security Rule (GLBA), the Data-At-Rest
mandate (DAR), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
About DriveSavers
DriveSavers Data
Recovery, the worldwide leader in data recovery services, provides
the fastest, most reliable and only certified secure data recovery
service in the industry. DriveSavers is the only data recovery company
to post proof of annual, company-wide SAS
70 Type II Audit Reports and its HIPAA
data security compliance. DriveSavers High Security Service adheres
to US Government security protocols, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Data
Security Rule (GLBA), the Data-At-Rest mandate (DAR) and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). DriveSavers maintains the most technologically
advanced Certified
ISO 5 (Class 100) cleanroom in the industry and is authorized to
open storage devices by all major storage device manufacturers without
voiding the warranty. DriveSavers engineers are trained and certified in
all leading encryption and forensics technologies. Satisfied customers
include: Bank of America, Google, Lucasfilm, NASA, Harvard University,
Salvation Army and The Rolling Stones. (http://www.drivesaversdatarecovery.com)
