RAID config for mailboxes host

September 09th, 2011 - 06:00 pm ET by Emmanuel Halbwachs | Report spam
Hello,

Slightly OT because not Debian specific.

Let this physical server:

Dell R710
2x6 cores 2.3 GHz
48 GB RAM
12 disks 600 GB, 15 ktr/min
only one RAID card H700

for the usage of a rather small mailhost:

MDA
IMAP/POP for 1500 mailboxes (Maildir)
webmail
(MX are other machines)

We consider two RAID config for the 12 disks:

A 2 disks RAID 1 for system
10 disks RAID 6 for mailbox space

B 12 disks RAID 6 for the whole

In A, we lose 1.2 (raw) TB with respect to B. Advocates of A say that
in B, the heads read/write activity of the mailboxes will seriously
impact the system performance. In A, the system has its own axes,
separate from the mailboxes ones.

Side note: We are considering dovecot.

Do you think that the performance loss will be so visible that it
worth sacrifying 1.2 TB of mailbox space?

Facts are far better than guesses, but how to bench those two configs,
with which test protocol, and how realistic?

Thanks,

Emmanuel Halbwachs Observatoire de Paris-Meudon
Resp. Réseau/Sécurité 5 Place Jules Janssen
tel : +33 1 45 07 75 54 F 92195 MEUDON CEDEX
fax : +33 1 45 07 01 89 véhicules : 11 av. Marcellin Berthelot


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110909215213.GJ28359@ltserver1.obspm.fr
email Follow the discussionReplies 6 repliesReplies Make a reply

Replies

#1 Sander
September 12th, 2011 - 06:00 am ET | Report spam
Emmanuel Halbwachs wrote (ao):
Let this physical server:

Dell R710
2x6 cores 2.3 GHz
48 GB RAM
12 disks 600 GB, 15 ktr/min
only one RAID card H700

for the usage of a rather small mailhost:

MDA
IMAP/POP for 1500 mailboxes (Maildir)
webmail
(MX are other machines)

We consider two RAID config for the 12 disks:

A 2 disks RAID 1 for system
10 disks RAID 6 for mailbox space

B 12 disks RAID 6 for the whole

In A, we lose 1.2 (raw) TB with respect to B. Advocates of A say that
in B, the heads read/write activity of the mailboxes will seriously
impact the system performance. In A, the system has its own axes,
separate from the mailboxes ones.



I would go for scenario B. If your workload is too much for the system,
you are screwed in both scenario A and B anyway, and in B you have extra
spindles.

Btw, any reason you go with spinning disks and not with SSDs like Intel
710/720? SSDs are a good fit for maildir workload (random IO).

Sander

Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/

Similar topics