Windows nuked by iddy-biddy HTML tag

December 21st, 2011 - 02:20 pm ET by Homer | Report spam
Witness the "superior" Powa and Kualitie of Windows:

[quote]
A simple HTML tag will crash 64-bit Windows 7
0-day leaves kernel in the wrong iframe of mind

An unpatched critical flaw in 64-bit Windows 7 leaves computers
vulnerable to a full 'blue screen of death' system crash.

...

The offending script is just an IFRAME tag with an overly large height
attribute. Although Safari is required to spark the system crash via
HTML, modern operating systems should not allow usermode applications to
bring down the machine. Microsoft is now investigating the
vulnerability, which was first reported by Twitter user w3bd3vil,
although the software giant is racing against hackers tracing the code
execution path to discover the underlying vulnerability in Windows 7.
[/quote]

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/1...rash_risk/

So much for "professional" software.

K. | "UNIX is basically a simple operating
http://slated.org | system, but you have to be a genius
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on šky | to understand the simplicity"
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 212 days | ~ Dennis Ritchie
email Follow the discussionReplies 92 repliesReplies Make a reply

Replies

#1 Snit
December 21st, 2011 - 03:08 pm ET | Report spam
Homer stated in post on 12/21/11 12:20 PM:

Witness the "superior" Powa and Kualitie of Windows:

[quote]
A simple HTML tag will crash 64-bit Windows 7
0-day leaves kernel in the wrong iframe of mind

An unpatched critical flaw in 64-bit Windows 7 leaves computers
vulnerable to a full 'blue screen of death' system crash.

...


The offending script is just an IFRAME tag with an overly large height
attribute. Although Safari is required to spark the system crash via
HTML, modern operating systems should not allow usermode applications to
bring down the machine. Microsoft is now investigating the
vulnerability, which was first reported by Twitter user w3bd3vil,
although the software giant is racing against hackers tracing the code
execution path to discover the underlying vulnerability in Windows 7.
[/quote]

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/1...rash_risk/

So much for "professional" software.



In your world does professional software have no bugs?

What you are doing here is twisting a claim: nobody denied professional
software has bugs. Nobody. What has been notes is how primitive many the
desktop Linux environment is in comparison to the competition. I have
provided examples... and would be happy to provide more.

But you and your herd run... spewing lies and insults in your wake.


Similar topics